Non-volatile memory (nvm) with imminent error prediction

ABSTRACT

A method and system are provided for determining an imminent failure of a non-volatile memory array. The method includes: performing a first array integrity read of the memory array until an error is detected; determining that the error is not error correction code (ECC) correctable, wherein a first word line voltage associated with the error is characterized as being a first threshold voltage; performing a second array integrity read of the memory array until all bits of the memory array indicate a predetermined state, wherein a second word line voltage associated with all of the bits indicating the predetermined state is a second threshold voltage; and comparing a difference between the first and second threshold voltages to a predetermined value.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION(S)

This application is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No.12/608405, filed Oct. 29, 2009, titled “THRESHOLD VOLTAGE TECHNIQUES FORDETECTING AN IMMINENT READ FAILURE IN A MEMORY ARRAY,” naming Richard K.Eguchi, Thomas S. Harp, Thomas Jew, Peter J. Kuhn, and Timothy J.Strauss as inventors, and assigned to the current assignee hereof, and

This application is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No.12/608476, filed Oct. 29, 2009, titled “TIME-BASED TECHNIQUES FORDETECTING AN IMMINENT READ FAILURE IN A MEMORY ARRAY,” naming Richard K.Eguchi, Thomas S. Harp, and Thomas Jew as inventors, and assigned to thecurrent assignee hereof

BACKGROUND

1. Field

This disclosure relates generally to non-volatile memories (NVMs), andmore specifically, to imminent error prediction of memory cells of theNVMs.

2. Related Art

Non-volatile memories (NVMs) have a limited endurance. Much work hasbeen done to increase this endurance, but there is currently noexpectation of this endurance having no limit. An NVM is typicallyspecified with a certain endurance that the NVM is guaranteed to meetwhich sets an expectation to the user. Individual NVMs will vary fromthis specified amount so that a few may not even meet the specifiedendurance whereas the others will exceed it and sometimes greatly exceedit. A user may keep using the NVM beyond the specified enduranceunintentionally or even intentionally. In either case and even in thecase where the NVM does not meet the specified endurance, as a result ofa latent defect for example, it would be beneficial to warn the user ofan imminent failure so that actions can be taken in advance of theactual failure. It is important that the prediction be accurate becausea false alarm could result in actions being taken that are unnecessary.Also if there is an expectation of a warning, an actual failure withoutthe warning could result in increased adverse affects because of theexpectation of the warning.

Accordingly, it is desirable to provide imminent failure warning for anNVM that improves upon one or more of the issues described above.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The present invention is illustrated by way of example and is notlimited by the accompanying figures, in which like references indicatesimilar elements. Elements in the figures are illustrated for simplicityand clarity and have not necessarily been drawn to scale.

FIG. 1 is a diagram of a system having an NVM array having imminenterror prediction;

FIG. 2 is a graph useful in understanding the operation of the system ofFIG. 1 regarding programmed memory cells in the NVM array of the systemof FIG. 1;

FIG. 3 is a flow diagram describing an operation of the system of FIG. 1for determining imminent failures in programmed cells;

FIG. 4 is a graph useful in understanding the operation of the system ofFIG. 1 regarding erased memory cells in the NVM array of the system ofFIG. 1;

FIG. 5 is a flow diagram describing an operation of the system of FIG. 1for determining imminent failures in erased cells; and

FIG. 6 is a flow diagram describing another operation of the system ofFIG. 1 for determining imminent failures in both programmed and erasedcells.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

In one aspect, an NVM system includes determining if there is imminentdanger of a memory cell short. These type of shorts include catastrophiccases where the memory block becomes inoperable due to a short from wordline to drain or word line to source. This may be conveniently used incombination with detecting if there are enough marginal NVM array cellsso that if they were in the wrong state, which is imminent, there wouldbe too much for error correction code (ECC) to be effective. This isbetter understood by reference to the drawings and the followingdescription.

Shown in FIG. 1 is an NVM system 10 including a memory controller 12, anNVM array 14, an address sequencer 16, a threshold voltage (Vt readlevel) modulator 18, an ECC decoder 20, and a check sum 22. The inputsand outputs as shown in FIG. 1 are multi-bit. Memory controller 12controls operation of NVM array 14. NVM array 14 has a first inputcoupled to an output of address sequencer 16, a second input coupled toan output of Vt level modulator, and an output coupled to an input ofECC decoder 20 and an input of check sum 22. Memory controller 12 has afirst output coupled to the inputs of Vt level modulator 18 and addresssequencer 16, a first input coupled to outputs of ECC decoder 20 andcheck sum 22. Memory controller 12 also has an input and an outputcoupled to a system bus of a larger system such as a system on a chip(SOC).

Shown in FIG. 2 is a distribution of programmed bits 24 of NVM array 14showing all of the bits that are programmed to a threshold voltage (Vt)distribution between a lowest programmed intrinsic Vt (LP) and a mostprogrammed Vt MP so that the distribution width WPr which issubstantially the same as a reference width of distribution. As shownWPr=MP−LP. The reference width is determined by a taking data forsuccessfully programmed memory cells and determining the typicaldistribution. With process variations the location of LP and MP changessomewhat but the difference, width WPr, between MP and LP remains moreconstant. The programming is done to achieve a normal read margin suchthat LP is above the normal read level which is a predetermined voltagelevel on the word lines that is used for performing a read during normaldevice operation. Eventually with enough program/erase cycles or due toa latent defect, memory cells will begin to degrade in their ability tobe programmed and/or erased. In the case of distributions as shown inFIG. 2, one of the deleterious affects that may happen is that some bitsmay be programmed or shifted to a lesser Vt. This is shown with adistribution 26, which in this example is substantially the same asdistribution 24, and further distributions 28 and 30 that haverelatively few bits. Distributions 28 and 30 could be single cells. Forthe case where distribution 28 represents the only bits outside ofdistribution 26 and these bits are correctable by ECC decoder 20, evenif they were failed bits at a given Vt read voltage, there would not bean expectation of an imminent failure of NVM array 14. On the otherhand, with the addition of distribution 30 being outside of maindistribution 26, and those in combination with distribution 28 would notbe correctable by ECC decoder 20 if both distributions 28 and 30 were inthe wrong state at a given Vt read voltage, then an imminent failure ispresent. The threshold voltage of distribution 30 then becomes the leastprogrammed intrinsic Vt (LP1). The most programmed Vt is MP1 and thedistribution width is WP1 for this case. Memory controller 12 runs adiagnostic on NVM array 14 to make this determination by comparing widthWP1 and with width WPr. If the difference is sufficiently great, then anerror is imminent. Another failure is for a memory cell to have anexceptionally high Vt. This is shown with a main distribution 32, whichin this example is substantially the same as distribution 24, and adistribution 34 having a higher Vt outside distribution 32 that hasrelatively few bits. Distribution 34 could be a single cell. In thiscase, the Vt of distribution 34 is determined when all bits in NVM array14 read as all erased at that Vt read voltage, which becomes the mostprogrammed Vt (MP2) for this case. The least programmed intrinsic Vt forthis case is LP2 and the distribution width is WP2 for this case. Memorycontroller 12 runs a diagnostic on NVM array 14 to make thisdetermination by comparing width WP2 and with width WPr. If thedifference is sufficiently great, then an error is imminent. Anexceptionally high threshold voltage outside the main distribution is anindicator that a catastrophic failure of that memory cell is imminent.The type of failure that is imminent is a short circuit which willprevent the program/erase circuit from functioning properly and thusrendering a portion of the NVM inoperable.

Shown in FIG. 3 is a flow chart showing how memory controller 12 runsNVM array 14 to determine the distribution of programmed bits andperforming comparison of the width of the actual distribution to thewidth of the reference distribution to determine if an error isimminent. At step 42 a diagnostic mode is entered and at step 44 anarray integrity read is performed using a Vt read level typicallystarting from the normal read level. The Vt read voltage typicallyapplies to the word line of NVM array 14, therefore it is also referredas the word line voltage. Memory controller 12 uses address sequencer 16in performing this task. If no uncorrectable ECC errors are found,indicating that either all bits are read as expected, or any errors(bits with unexpected values) found can be corrected by ECC, then atstep 48 Vt read level is incremented. The incremented Vt read level isthen used to read the array at step 44. At step 46 again a determinationis made if there are any uncorrectable ECC errors. If not, Vt read levelis again incremented by memory controller 12 using Vt level modulator 18and the NVM array is read again at the incremented Vt read level. Memorycontroller 12 again determines if any uncorrectable ECC errors arefound. This iterative process of increasing the Vt read voltage andtesting continues until an uncorrectable ECC error is found. The Vt readlevel at which this first uncorrectable ECC read error occurs is theleast programmed intrinsic Vt which is LP in distribution 24, LP1 fordistributions 26, 28, and 30, and LP2 for distributions 32 and 34. Thisinformation is then stored as shown in step 50.

The process continues by applying Vt read level, beginning using thelast value used in step 44 to perform an array integrity read as in step52 but now testing, in step 54, to determine if NVM array 14 is in anall erased condition. This is achieved using checksum 22 in thisexample. The checksum logic is designed to have a unique value for allerased state and a unique value for all programmed state, and bothvalues will be different from the ones for all other array states. Thechecksum is a faster way to check if all bits in the array are erased orprogrammed. In another embodiment, such check can be done by reading andcompare to expected value for one address at a time. If they are not inthe all erased condition, Vt read level is further incremented as shownin step 56 and the array integrity read is performed again. Thisiterative process continues until checksum 22 indicates to memorycontroller 12 that the all bits are read as erased. When this occurs,the Vt of the most programmed bit has been found and this information isstored as shown in step 58. The point at which this occurs is MP fordistribution 24, MP1 for distributions 26, 28, and 30, and MP2 fordistributions 32 and 34.

As shown in step 60, a width of the actual distribution is calculated bysubtracting the Vt read level at the actual least programmed intrinsiclocation (actual LP) from the Vt read level at the most programmedlocation (actual MP). At step 62 this actual width is compared to thereference value, WPr. The reference value may be established fromaccumulated data. An alternative is to use a width value determined fromNVM array 14 itself at production test flow or some other appropriatestage early in its program/erase cycles. If the comparison indicates asufficiently small difference that there is no imminent error on theprogrammed side, then in step 64 a pass is indicated and the diagnosticmode is exited. On the other hand if the comparison indicates asufficiently large difference that there is an imminent error, then instep 68 an “imminent failure” is indicated as the status and thediagnostic mode is exited.

Using the width of the distribution as the comparison is beneficialbecause the width of the good distribution changes relatively littlewith process variations. Also this takes into account the imminenterrors that are indicated by an excessively high Vt of bits oruncorrectable ECC errors.

Shown in FIG. 4 are three distributions similar to those shown in FIG. 2but for the erased condition. Distribution 70 is a referencedistribution showing the least erased intrinsic Vt LE nearer to thenormal read line than the most erased Vt ME. The difference between MEand LE is the reference width WEr (WEr=LE−ME). Also shown is a maindistribution 72 and two smaller distributions 74 and 76, being lesserased than main distribution 72, that may occur in NVM array 14.Distributions 74 and 76 could be single cells. This shows a width of WE1in which the least erased intrinsic Vt LE1 is at the distribution 74indicating that distribution 76 is ECC correctable if it were in thewrong state but the combination of distribution 74 and 76 would not beif they both were in the wrong state at a Vt read level. Also shown isanother alternative for NVM array 14 showing a main distribution 78 anda smaller distribution 79 which has a more erased condition than maindistribution 78. Distribution 79 could be a single cell. In this casethe most erased Vt ME2 is at the distribution 79. A memory cell that issignificantly more in the erased condition than the normal distributionis a memory cell that is about to become short circuited and thus causea failure for circuitry used for other memory cells.

Shown in FIG. 5 is a flow chart similar to flow chart 40 performed bymemory controller 12, but it is for the erased bits. After entering thediagnostic mode in step 80, an array integrity read is performed using aVt read level, typically starting from the normal read level, at step82. If no uncorrectable ECC errors are found, indicating that either allbits are read as expected, or any errors (bits with unexpected values)found can be corrected by ECC, then at step 86 Vt read level isdecremented. The decremented Vt read level is then used to read thearray at step 82. At step 84 again a determination is made if there areany uncorrectable ECC errors. If not, Vt read level is again decrementedand the NVM array is read. Memory controller 12 again determines if anyuncorrectable ECC errors are found. This iterative process of decreasingthe Vt read voltage and testing continues until an uncorrectable ECCerror is found. The Vt read level at which this first occurs is theleast erased intrinsic Vt which is LE in distribution 70, LE1 fordistributions 72, 74, and 76, and LE2 for distributions 78 and 79. Thisinformation is then stored as shown in step 88.

The process continues by applying Vt read level, beginning using thelast value used in step 82 to perform an array integrity read as in step90 but now testing, in step 92, to determine if NVM array 14 is in anall programmed condition. In one embodiment, this is achieved usingchecksum 22. In another embodiment, such check can be done by readingand compare to expected value for one address at a time. If they are notin the all programmed condition, Vt read level is further decremented asshown in step 94 and the array integrity read is performed again. Thisiterative process continues until checksum 22 indicates that the allbits are read as programmed. When this occurs, the Vt of the most erasedbit has been found and this information is stored as shown in step 96.In the case of distributions 72, 74, and 76, the stored value is ME1. Inthe case of distributions 78 and 79, the stored value is ME2. At step98, the actual width is calculated by subtracting the actual ME from theactual LE and then at step 100 is compared to the reference width. Ifthe actual width is sufficiently close to the reference width WEr, apass is indicated at step 102 and the diagnostic mode is exited at step104. If the actual width is sufficiently different from the referencewidth, then an imminent failure is indicated at step 106 and thediagnostic mode is exited in step 104.

The programmed and erased states are analogous with regard to imminentfailure detection. An NVM array typically contains both erased andprogrammed memory cells. Therefore, typically both the flows shown inFIG. 3 and FIG. 5 need to executed on an NVM array to check the Vt widthof both programmed and erased cells.

There is an alternative that is a way to reduce the diagnostic time butat the loss of obtaining characterization data as shown in FIG. 6. Notethat FIG. 6 shows the operation for both programmed condition and erasedcondition. The references on the left side of “/” are corresponding tothe programmed condition, and the references on the right side of “/”are corresponding to the erased condition. After the least programmedinstrinsic Vt, LP, or least erased intrinsic Vt, LE, has been determinedusing above methods, the next array integrity read may be performed atthe Vt read level determined using the reference widths which areanalogous to WPr and WEr as shown in FIGS. 2 and 4. We define theprogram width offset reference as WPd, which is equal to WPr plus apredetermined margin. We define the erase width offset reference as WEd,which is equal to WEr plus a predetermined margin. So in that sense theprogram and erase width offset references WPd and WEd would differ fromWPr and WEr in that there would be added margin. This can be viewed asshown in FIG. 6, steps 110 and 112, where step 110 determines the actualLP and LE and step 112 adds the program width offset reference, WPd, tothe actual LP and subtracts the erase width offset reference, WEd, fromthe actual LE. One way this could be implemented for the programmedmemory cells is that the Vt read level of the next integrity read, step114, would be at the least programmed intrinsic Vt, LP, plus the programwidth offset reference, WPd. Then if the checksum determines that allbits are read as erased at this Vt read level, step 116, then it isknown that none of the memory cells are imminent failures on theprogrammed side, step 118. If the checksum determines that not all bitsare read as erased at this Vt read level, step 116, then it is knownthere is at least one memory cell that has too high of a thresholdvoltage and thus an indication of imminent failure would be generated,step 120. In this approach, the actual MP is not found but it is knownif the actual MP exceeds the LP plus the reference width, WPd. Checkingthe erased memory cells would be done analogously with the actual LEbeing determined, the erase width offset reference WEd, subtracted, andthe integrity read performed. If the checksum indicates that all bitsread as programmed, then there is no imminent failure on the erasedside, but if the checksum indicates a not all programmed state, then animminent failure indication is generated because it is certain that amemory cell has too low of a threshold voltage and is in imminent dangerof failing. This same principle can be used as a stopping point whilestill collecting characterization data. The processes as indicated insteps 52, 54, and 56 and steps 90, 92, and 94 would be performed butincrementing would be stopped if it reached the actual LP plus thereference width or LE minus the reference width. No further integrityreads are required because it is then known if there is memory cell witheither too great or too low of a threshold voltage under the samereasoning applied immediately above.

By now it should be appreciated that there has been provided a methodfor determining an imminent failure of a non-volatile memory array. Themethod includes performing a first array integrity read of thenon-volatile memory array until an error is detected. The method furtherincludes determining that the error is not error correction code (ECC)correctable, wherein a first word line voltage associated with the erroris characterized as being a first threshold voltage. The method furtherincludes performing a second array integrity read of the memory arrayuntil all bits of the memory array indicate a predetermined state,wherein a second word line voltage associated with all of the bits beingthe predetermined state is a second threshold voltage. The methodfurther includes comparing a difference between the first and secondthreshold voltages to a predetermined value. The method may have afurther characterization by which the first array integrity readindicates a read error. The method may have a further characterizationby which the method is performed during a diagnostic mode of thenon-volatile memory array. The method may have a furthercharacterization by which the first array integrity read is accomplishedby performing read operations of the memory array while sweeping a wordline read voltage from an initial word line voltage to the first wordline voltage. The method may have a further characterization by whichperforming the second array integrity read of the non-volatile memoryarray until all bits of the non-volatile memory array indicate apredetermined state further comprises checking a check sum value todetermine when all bits of the non-volatile memory array indicate thepredetermined state. The method may have a further characterization bywhich checking the check sum value further comprises the check sum valuebeing a first value when all bits of the non-volatile memory array areprogrammed, and the check sum value being a second value when all bitsof the memory array are erased, wherein the first value is not equal tothe second value, wherein the first value and the second value aredifferent from any other checksum value associated with the memoryarray. The method may have a further characterization by which comparingthe difference between the first and second threshold voltages to thepredetermined value further comprises indicating the imminent failure ofthe non-volatile memory array when the difference between the first andsecond threshold voltage is outside a predetermined range based on thepredetermined value. The method may have a further characterization bywhich the second array integrity read is accomplished by performing readoperations of the non-volatile memory array while sweeping a word lineread voltage from the first word line voltage to the second word linevoltage. The method may have a further characterization by whichperforming a second array integrity read of the non-volatile memoryarray until all bits of the non-volatile memory array indicate apredetermined state further comprises reading all array locations andcomparing logic states of the read locations to the predetermined state.

Also disclosed is a method for determining an imminent failure of anon-volatile memory array. The method includes performing a first arrayintegrity read operation of the non-volatile memory array until an erroris detected. The method further includes determining that the error isnot error correction code (ECC) correctable, wherein a first word linevoltage associated with the error is characterized as being a firstthreshold voltage. The method further includes performing a second arrayintegrity read operation of the non-volatile memory array, the secondarray integrity read operation comprising reading the array with a wordline read voltage that is offset from the first threshold voltage andbased on a predetermined width offset reference value. The methodfurther includes checking a check sum value resulting from the secondarray integrity read operation, wherein when the check sum value isequal to a predetermined check sum value, there is not imminent failurein the memory array, and wherein when the check sum value is not equalto the predetermined check sum value, then there is imminent failure inthe non-volatile memory array. The method may have a furthercharacterization by which the first array integrity read operation isaccomplished by performing read operations of the non-volatile memoryarray while sweeping the word line read voltage within a predeterminedrange. The method may have a further characterization by which checkingthe check sum value further comprises the check sum value being a firstvalue when all bits of the non-volatile memory array are programmed, andthe check sum value being a second value when all bits of thenon-volatile memory array are erased, wherein the first value is notequal to the second value and wherein the first value and the secondvalue are different from any other checksum value associated with thememory array. The method may have a further characterization by whichthe predetermined width offset reference value is based on a predefinedthreshold voltage width including a margin. The method may have afurther characterization by which the method is performed during adiagnostic mode of the non-volatile memory array. The method may furtherinclude storing the first threshold voltage and the predetermined widthoffset reference value in predetermined locations of the non-volatilememory array.

Disclosed also is a system. The system includes a memory array having aplurality of memory cells, each memory cell of the plurality of memorycells coupled to a word line and a bit line. The system further includesa threshold voltage modulator coupled to the word line, the thresholdvoltage modulator for providing a range of voltage levels to the wordline during a diagnostic mode of the system. The system further includesan error correction code (ECC) decoder coupled to the memory array. Thesystem further includes a memory controller coupled to the memory array,the threshold voltage modulator, and the ECC decoder, the memorycontroller for controlling a first array integrity read operation of thememory array until a read error is detected, the memory controller fordetermining that the read error is not ECC correctable, wherein a firstword line voltage associated with the read error is characterized asbeing a first threshold voltage, the memory controller for controlling asecond array integrity read operation of the memory array until all bitsof the memory array indicate a predetermined state, wherein a secondword line voltage associated with all of the bits indicating thepredetermined state is a second threshold voltage, and the memorycontroller for comparing a difference between the first and secondthreshold voltages to a predetermined value. The system may have afurther characterization by which the memory controller is furthercharacterized as being for indicating an imminent failure of the memoryarray when the difference between the first and second threshold voltageis greater than the predetermined value. The system may have a furthercharacterization by which the memory array comprises a plurality offlash memory cells. The system may further comprise an address sequencercoupled to the memory array, the address sequencer for selecting each ofthe plurality of memory cells during the first and second arrayintegrity read operations. The system may further comprise a check sumregister coupled to the memory array, a check sum value stored in thecheck sum register is used to determine when all bits of the memoryarray indicate the predetermined state.

Although the invention is described herein with reference to specificembodiments, various modifications and changes can be made withoutdeparting from the scope of the present invention as set forth in theclaims below. Accordingly, the specification and figures are to beregarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense, and allsuch modifications are intended to be included within the scope of thepresent invention. Any benefits, advantages, or solutions to problemsthat are described herein with regard to specific embodiments are notintended to be construed as a critical, required, or essential featureor element of any or all the claims.

The term “coupled,” as used herein, is not intended to be limited to adirect coupling or a mechanical coupling. The term “cells”, “memorycells” and “bits” are used interchangeably herein and they all refer tothe memory bit cells in NVM array.

Furthermore, the terms “a” or “an,” as used herein, are defined as oneor more than one. Also, the use of introductory phrases such as “atleast one” and “one or more” in the claims should not be construed toimply that the introduction of another claim element by the indefinitearticles “a” or “an” limits any particular claim containing suchintroduced claim element to inventions containing only one such element,even when the same claim includes the introductory phrases “one or more”or “at least one” and indefinite articles such as “a” or “an.” The sameholds true for the use of definite articles.

Unless stated otherwise, terms such as “first” and “second” are used toarbitrarily distinguish between the elements such terms describe. Thus,these terms are not necessarily intended to indicate temporal or otherprioritization of such elements.

What is claimed is:
 1. A method for determining an imminent failure of anon-volatile memory array, the method comprising: performing a firstarray integrity read of the non-volatile memory array until an error isdetected; determining that the error is not error correction code (ECC)correctable, wherein a first word line voltage associated with the erroris characterized as being a first threshold voltage; performing a secondarray integrity read of the memory array until all bits of the memoryarray indicate a predetermined state, wherein a second word line voltageassociated with all of the bits being the predetermined state is asecond threshold voltage; and comparing a difference between the firstand second threshold voltages to a predetermined value.
 2. The method ofclaim 1, wherein the first array integrity read indicates a read error.3. The method of claim 1, wherein the method is performed during adiagnostic mode of the non-volatile memory array.
 4. The method of claim1, wherein the first array integrity read is accomplished by performingread operations of the memory array while sweeping a word line readvoltage from an initial word line voltage to the first word linevoltage.
 5. The method of claim 1, wherein performing the second arrayintegrity read of the non-volatile memory array until all bits of thenon-volatile memory array indicate a predetermined state furthercomprises checking a check sum value to determine when all bits of thenon-volatile memory array indicate the predetermined state.
 6. Themethod of claim 5, wherein checking the check sum value furthercomprises the check sum value being a first value when all bits of thenon-volatile memory array are programmed, and the check sum value beinga second value when all bits of the memory array are erased, wherein thefirst value is not equal to the second value, wherein the first valueand the second value are different from any other checksum valueassociated with the memory array.
 7. The method of claim 1, whereincomparing the difference between the first and second threshold voltagesto the predetermined value further comprises indicating the imminentfailure of the non-volatile memory array when the difference between thefirst and second threshold voltage is outside a predetermined rangebased on the predetermined value.
 8. The method of claim 1, wherein thesecond array integrity read is accomplished by performing readoperations of the non-volatile memory array while sweeping a word lineread voltage from the first word line voltage to the second word linevoltage.
 9. The method of claim 1, wherein performing a second arrayintegrity read of the non-volatile memory array until all bits of thenon-volatile memory array indicate a predetermined state furthercomprises reading all array locations and comparing logic states of theread locations to the predetermined state.
 10. A method for determiningan imminent failure of a non-volatile memory array, the methodcomprising: performing a first array integrity read operation of thenon-volatile memory array until an error is detected; determining thatthe error is not error correction code (ECC) correctable, wherein afirst word line voltage associated with the error is characterized asbeing a first threshold voltage; performing a second array integrityread operation of the non-volatile memory array, the second arrayintegrity read operation comprising reading the array with a word lineread voltage that is offset from the first threshold voltage and basedon a predetermined width offset reference value; and checking a checksum value resulting from the second array integrity read operation,wherein when the check sum value is equal to a predetermined check sumvalue, there is not imminent failure in the memory array, and whereinwhen the check sum value is not equal to the predetermined check sumvalue, then there is imminent failure in the non-volatile memory array.11. The method of claim 10, wherein the first array integrity readoperation is accomplished by performing read operations of thenon-volatile memory array while sweeping the word line read voltagewithin a predetermined range.
 12. The method of claim 10, whereinchecking the check sum value further comprises the check sum value beinga first value when all bits of the non-volatile memory array areprogrammed, and the check sum value being a second value when all bitsof the non-volatile memory array are erased, wherein the first value isnot equal to the second value and wherein the first value and the secondvalue are different from any other checksum value associated with thememory array.
 13. The method of claim 10, wherein the predeterminedwidth offset reference value is based on a predefined threshold voltagewidth including a margin.
 14. The method of claim 10, wherein the methodis performed during a diagnostic mode of the non-volatile memory array.15. The method of claim 10, further comprising storing the firstthreshold voltage and the predetermined width offset reference value inpredetermined locations of the non-volatile memory array.
 16. A systemcomprising: a memory array having a plurality of memory cells, eachmemory cell of the plurality of memory cells coupled to a word line anda bit line; a threshold voltage modulator coupled to the word line, thethreshold voltage modulator for providing a range of voltage levels tothe word line during a diagnostic mode of the system; an errorcorrection code (ECC) decoder coupled to the memory array; and a memorycontroller coupled to the memory array, the threshold voltage modulator,and the ECC decoder, the memory controller for controlling a first arrayintegrity read operation of the memory array until a read error isdetected, the memory controller for determining that the read error isnot ECC correctable, wherein a first word line voltage associated withthe read error is characterized as being a first threshold voltage, thememory controller for controlling a second array integrity readoperation of the memory array until all bits of the memory arrayindicate a predetermined state, wherein a second word line voltageassociated with all of the bits indicating the predetermined state is asecond threshold voltage, and the memory controller for comparing adifference between the first and second threshold voltages to apredetermined value.
 17. The system of claim 16, wherein the memorycontroller is further characterized as being for indicating an imminentfailure of the memory array when the difference between the first andsecond threshold voltage is greater than the predetermined value. 18.The system of claim 16, wherein the memory array comprises a pluralityof flash memory cells.
 19. The system of claim 16, further comprising anaddress sequencer coupled to the memory array, the address sequencer forselecting each of the plurality of memory cells during the first andsecond array integrity read operations.
 20. The system of claim 16,further comprising a check sum register coupled to the memory array, acheck sum value stored in the check sum register is used to determinewhen all bits of the memory array indicate the predetermined state.